Yesterday, 10:18 AM
Oeed Are We Taxpayers amp; 8211; Or Suckers
The Defense Department s investigation into the attack that killed 13 U.S. service members and about 170 Afghans at the Abbey Gate at the Kabul airport in August found that a single explosive device was responsible, according to CENTCOM Commander General Kenneth McKenzie.On Friday, the Pentagon released its report on the investigation into the suicide bombi stanley thermos ng at the Kabul airport in the chaotic last days of the U.S. evacuation from Afghanistan.McKenzie told reporters at the Pentagon that the bombing was not, as pre stanley cups viously thought, a complex attack, and no service members or Afghans were killed or wounded by gunshots. All injuries and deaths were caused by the blast. There was some consideration given to the possibility that the attack had included a gun fight, but the investigation found that injuries thought to have been caused by bullets were not. We now know that the explosively-fired bal stanley canada l bearings caused wounds that looked like gunshots, McKenzie said. He added that the disturbing lethality of the explosive device was confirmed by the 58 U.S. service members who were killed and wounded mdash; despite the universal wear of body armor and helmets that did stop ball bearings that impacted them hellip; but could not prevent catastrophic injuries to areas not covered. The Defense Department also showed video that is the only known footage of the blast. It portrays an individual dressed entirely in black, and the blast seems to ema Xjql Obama, Bush, And A First Amendment Heroine In Virginia
AP Bill Burck and Dana Perino have written a piece for National Review that unearths a 2004 amicus brief signed by Attorney General Eric Holder that states that civil liberties protections might impede the investigation of a terrorist offense in some circumstances. They contrast that claim with President Obama s words that America stanley thermos mug n should reject the false choice between our security and our ideals and make a case that Holder is being disingenuous by claiming that trying alleged terrorists in civilian courts won t harm national security. It is conceivable that, in some hypothetical situation, despite the array of powers stanley cup described above, the government might be unable to detain a dangerous terrorist or to interrogate him or her effectively, the 2004 brief states. But this is an inherent consequence of the limitation of Executive power. No doubt many other steps could be taken that would increase our security, a stanley thermos nd could enable us to prevent terrorist attacks that might otherwise occur. But our Nation has always been prepared to accept some risk as the price of guaranteeing that the Executive does not have arbitrary power to imprison citizens. The brief in question discusses, in reference to the Jose Padilla case, whether the president has the legal authority to hold without charges a U.S. citizen captured on American soil, in the manor of an enemy combatant. It may be true that in some instanc
The Defense Department s investigation into the attack that killed 13 U.S. service members and about 170 Afghans at the Abbey Gate at the Kabul airport in August found that a single explosive device was responsible, according to CENTCOM Commander General Kenneth McKenzie.On Friday, the Pentagon released its report on the investigation into the suicide bombi stanley thermos ng at the Kabul airport in the chaotic last days of the U.S. evacuation from Afghanistan.McKenzie told reporters at the Pentagon that the bombing was not, as pre stanley cups viously thought, a complex attack, and no service members or Afghans were killed or wounded by gunshots. All injuries and deaths were caused by the blast. There was some consideration given to the possibility that the attack had included a gun fight, but the investigation found that injuries thought to have been caused by bullets were not. We now know that the explosively-fired bal stanley canada l bearings caused wounds that looked like gunshots, McKenzie said. He added that the disturbing lethality of the explosive device was confirmed by the 58 U.S. service members who were killed and wounded mdash; despite the universal wear of body armor and helmets that did stop ball bearings that impacted them hellip; but could not prevent catastrophic injuries to areas not covered. The Defense Department also showed video that is the only known footage of the blast. It portrays an individual dressed entirely in black, and the blast seems to ema Xjql Obama, Bush, And A First Amendment Heroine In Virginia
AP Bill Burck and Dana Perino have written a piece for National Review that unearths a 2004 amicus brief signed by Attorney General Eric Holder that states that civil liberties protections might impede the investigation of a terrorist offense in some circumstances. They contrast that claim with President Obama s words that America stanley thermos mug n should reject the false choice between our security and our ideals and make a case that Holder is being disingenuous by claiming that trying alleged terrorists in civilian courts won t harm national security. It is conceivable that, in some hypothetical situation, despite the array of powers stanley cup described above, the government might be unable to detain a dangerous terrorist or to interrogate him or her effectively, the 2004 brief states. But this is an inherent consequence of the limitation of Executive power. No doubt many other steps could be taken that would increase our security, a stanley thermos nd could enable us to prevent terrorist attacks that might otherwise occur. But our Nation has always been prepared to accept some risk as the price of guaranteeing that the Executive does not have arbitrary power to imprison citizens. The brief in question discusses, in reference to the Jose Padilla case, whether the president has the legal authority to hold without charges a U.S. citizen captured on American soil, in the manor of an enemy combatant. It may be true that in some instanc
