Yesterday, 08:48 AM
Xddl Tim Walz pressed about 2018 weapons of war statement in CNN interview
Washington mdash; The Supreme Court on Thursday heard oral arguments in a blockbuster case over whether former President Donald Trump can be excluded from Colorado s primary ballot over his actions surrounding the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.The case hinges on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars officials who have sworn to support the Constitution from serving in government if they engage in insurrection. The provision was enacted in 1868 to prevent former Confederates from holding office, and laid mostly dormant for more than 150 years.A group of voters in Colorado challenged Trump s eligibility for the Wh stanley water bottle ite House, citing Jan. 6. A divided Colorado Supreme Court ruled in December that Section 3 meant Trump was ineligible for office and thus could not appear on the state s primary election ballot. The court paused its ruling so Trump could appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. During oral arguments in the case, known as Trump v. Anderson, lawyers for both sides and the Colorado secretary of state laid out their positions before the nation s highest court. Many of the justices seemed skeptical of the idea tha stanley deutschland t states could enforce Section 3 like Colorado did and appeared poised to let Trump remain on the ballot.Here are five key takeaways from the oral arguments: Roberts calls Colorado voters position ahistorical An exchange between Chief Justice John Roberts and Jason Mu stanley flasche rray, a Colorado attorney appearing on beha Plci No Campus Surge For Obama In Pa.
Conservative opponents of the economic rescue bill have taken to the airwaves to deride the extra tax provisions as either pork or subsidies. The reality, though, is that almost all of the provisions are extensions of existing tax cuts or tax incentives, and letting them expire would put Congress on record backing a tax increase, something most conservatives would like to avoid.This chart from Taxpayers for Common Sense, a watchdog group, does a good job of laying out the big AMT tax relief and the small tariff on wooden children s arrows tax provisions. Many of the line items, like the break for wool producers or Virgin Islands rum makers, will undoubtedly be mocked on the House floor by opponents tomorrow before the next big vote.But another leading anti-tax group warns conservatives that criticizing these items runs counter to their fiscal philosophy. Some conservatives in the press and in the blogosphere are calling tax cuts in the bailout package earmarks and pork this week, saidRyan Ellis Tax Policy Director forAmericans for Tax Reform. Calling tax cuts earmarks is very unhelpful and completely wrong from a fiscal conservative perspective. stanley quencher ponent--type-recirculation .item:nth-child 5 display: none; inline-recirc-item--id-c89d2ca6-8c88-11e stanley cups 2-b06b-024c619f5c3d, right-rail-recirc-item--id-c89d2ca6-8c88-11e2-b06b-024c619f5c3d stanley cup display: none; inline-recirc-item--id
Washington mdash; The Supreme Court on Thursday heard oral arguments in a blockbuster case over whether former President Donald Trump can be excluded from Colorado s primary ballot over his actions surrounding the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.The case hinges on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars officials who have sworn to support the Constitution from serving in government if they engage in insurrection. The provision was enacted in 1868 to prevent former Confederates from holding office, and laid mostly dormant for more than 150 years.A group of voters in Colorado challenged Trump s eligibility for the Wh stanley water bottle ite House, citing Jan. 6. A divided Colorado Supreme Court ruled in December that Section 3 meant Trump was ineligible for office and thus could not appear on the state s primary election ballot. The court paused its ruling so Trump could appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. During oral arguments in the case, known as Trump v. Anderson, lawyers for both sides and the Colorado secretary of state laid out their positions before the nation s highest court. Many of the justices seemed skeptical of the idea tha stanley deutschland t states could enforce Section 3 like Colorado did and appeared poised to let Trump remain on the ballot.Here are five key takeaways from the oral arguments: Roberts calls Colorado voters position ahistorical An exchange between Chief Justice John Roberts and Jason Mu stanley flasche rray, a Colorado attorney appearing on beha Plci No Campus Surge For Obama In Pa.
Conservative opponents of the economic rescue bill have taken to the airwaves to deride the extra tax provisions as either pork or subsidies. The reality, though, is that almost all of the provisions are extensions of existing tax cuts or tax incentives, and letting them expire would put Congress on record backing a tax increase, something most conservatives would like to avoid.This chart from Taxpayers for Common Sense, a watchdog group, does a good job of laying out the big AMT tax relief and the small tariff on wooden children s arrows tax provisions. Many of the line items, like the break for wool producers or Virgin Islands rum makers, will undoubtedly be mocked on the House floor by opponents tomorrow before the next big vote.But another leading anti-tax group warns conservatives that criticizing these items runs counter to their fiscal philosophy. Some conservatives in the press and in the blogosphere are calling tax cuts in the bailout package earmarks and pork this week, saidRyan Ellis Tax Policy Director forAmericans for Tax Reform. Calling tax cuts earmarks is very unhelpful and completely wrong from a fiscal conservative perspective. stanley quencher ponent--type-recirculation .item:nth-child 5 display: none; inline-recirc-item--id-c89d2ca6-8c88-11e stanley cups 2-b06b-024c619f5c3d, right-rail-recirc-item--id-c89d2ca6-8c88-11e2-b06b-024c619f5c3d stanley cup display: none; inline-recirc-item--id
