12-22-2024, 05:06 PM
Ymyy Reminder: The Facebook IPO Won t Make You Rich
The FTC is getting ready to serve Google with a subpoena in an emerging antitrust case against the search giant. stanley cup There had been rumblings about a probe for the past stanley mug few months, and the committee is now moving ahead with the investigation. https://gizmodo/google-might-get-hit-wit...on-5789011 The probe is the most serious antitrust concern Google has faced, but it doesn ;t seem to pose too much danger. It not illegal to have a monopoly in the U.S.鈥攐nly to abuse it. The case for abuse is that Google natural search results alter the marketplace and control whether businesses succeed or fail, and also that Google promotes its own sites in searches, starving competitors of traffic. Which seems pretty slim. [WSJ] stanley cup Google Szmx Automator Your iPhone, Sing-A-Long, Make Commitments, and Take Quality iPhone Photos
When a judge decides to dismiss evidence you feel would make your case in a patent lawsuit, you have one of two options: a You can sit back and deal with it like a timid little tktkt or stanley mug b you can fire back and choose another public-facing channel to disseminate your information. Samsung chose the latter, opting to send its dismissed slides from its legal battle with Apple to the press, and drawing the ire of the judge overseeing the case. At the start of yesterday opening arguments, Samsung lawyer John Quinn argued that a slide containing phones designed prior to the iPhone unveiling鈥攊ncluding the F700 phone鈥攂e counted as evidence. The judge then threatened to sanction the lawyer and that seemed like the end of it. But as the AllThingsD tells it, Samsung sent them the slides with the following message: The Judge exclusion of evidence on independent creation meant that even though Apple was allowed to inaccurately argue to the jury that the F700 was an iPhone copy, Samsung was not allowed to tell the jury the full story and show the pre-iPhone design for that and other phones that were in development at Samsung in 2006, before the iPhone. The excluded evidence would have established beyond doubt that Samsung did not copy the iPhone design. Fundamental fairness require botella stanley s that the jury decide the case based on all the evidence. stanley cup AllThingsD went on to post them. Judge Koh eventually found out and was not pleased, halting proceedings to find out Quinn
The FTC is getting ready to serve Google with a subpoena in an emerging antitrust case against the search giant. stanley cup There had been rumblings about a probe for the past stanley mug few months, and the committee is now moving ahead with the investigation. https://gizmodo/google-might-get-hit-wit...on-5789011 The probe is the most serious antitrust concern Google has faced, but it doesn ;t seem to pose too much danger. It not illegal to have a monopoly in the U.S.鈥攐nly to abuse it. The case for abuse is that Google natural search results alter the marketplace and control whether businesses succeed or fail, and also that Google promotes its own sites in searches, starving competitors of traffic. Which seems pretty slim. [WSJ] stanley cup Google Szmx Automator Your iPhone, Sing-A-Long, Make Commitments, and Take Quality iPhone Photos
When a judge decides to dismiss evidence you feel would make your case in a patent lawsuit, you have one of two options: a You can sit back and deal with it like a timid little tktkt or stanley mug b you can fire back and choose another public-facing channel to disseminate your information. Samsung chose the latter, opting to send its dismissed slides from its legal battle with Apple to the press, and drawing the ire of the judge overseeing the case. At the start of yesterday opening arguments, Samsung lawyer John Quinn argued that a slide containing phones designed prior to the iPhone unveiling鈥攊ncluding the F700 phone鈥攂e counted as evidence. The judge then threatened to sanction the lawyer and that seemed like the end of it. But as the AllThingsD tells it, Samsung sent them the slides with the following message: The Judge exclusion of evidence on independent creation meant that even though Apple was allowed to inaccurately argue to the jury that the F700 was an iPhone copy, Samsung was not allowed to tell the jury the full story and show the pre-iPhone design for that and other phones that were in development at Samsung in 2006, before the iPhone. The excluded evidence would have established beyond doubt that Samsung did not copy the iPhone design. Fundamental fairness require botella stanley s that the jury decide the case based on all the evidence. stanley cup AllThingsD went on to post them. Judge Koh eventually found out and was not pleased, halting proceedings to find out Quinn
