Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
jtqo The B-52 s: Rock Lobster
#1
Abux Settle It: Get Your Facts Straight Before You Vote
My immediate reaction of flying into a tirade against useless kitchen gadgets is probably going to end with me having a heart attack in Williams-Sonoma one day. But ridiculous crap like this Hutzler banana peeler needs to be called out. When r stanley cup ipe and edible, bananas are one of the easiest foods to cut. You could probably slice a banana with a room temperature pat of stanley tumbler butter if you needed. Or, lacking even that, its own peel. And your cereal or banana bread isn ;t stanley cupe going to taste any different if one piece is slightly larger than another. It ridiculous, and even for just $2.50 no one needs it taking up drawer space in their kitchen. [Hutzler via The Red Ferret Journal] CookingFoodUtensils Rrpb Toshiba s New Excite 10 SE Looks Like a Sweet Tablet On a Budget
I love pork. I like pigs. They ;re cute, and fun to eat, and intelligent among mud-dwelling beasts. But what I don ;t like is for my dinner to artificially resemble the killed animal from which it was derived. This is gross. Or is it amazing The shrink wrapped pseudo-pig, a pork roast molded into the vague form of its prior self, is certainly a feat of food engineering. I ;d expect nothing less from Costco, the Ikea of edibles. But will pork taste more like pork when it compressed into animal form Chicken nuggets are absolutely better in dinosa stanley cup ur shape, but there you have a sort of perverse species incongruence. Would the pork roast be delicious and aesthetically acceptable if it were molded into the shape of, say, a cat, whale, or amoeba Does anyone out there have a hydraulic press and an ample stanley france supply of raw meat [Consumerist] You can keep up with Sam Biddle, the author of this post, on Twitter, Facebo stanley thermobecher ok, or Google+. CostcoFoodmodoPigsPork
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)